Difference between revisions of "The Servant (1973)"
(→External Links) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Directed by [[John Harris]] | Directed by [[John Harris]] | ||
| − | Performances: | + | Performances: June [[1973]], [[Bell Theatre|Theatre]] |
Revision as of 13:29, 25 October 2008
Directed by John Harris
Performances: June 1973, Theatre
Contents
Introduction
Text about the play
Cast
- Richard Merton - Roger Dettmer
- Sally Grant - Janet Blackley
- Tony Williams - Brian Scoltock
- Barrett - Robert Holden
- Vera - Vivienne Miles
- Mabel - Sarah Saunders
Crew
- Stage Manager - Peter Davies
- Assistant Stage managers - Robin Saxon, Dennis Picott, Vera Amato, Glyn Putwain, Clarence Llewelyn-Smith & Dennis Packham
- Lighting Design - Mike Archer
- Lighting Operators - Wendy Opie & Ardian Towler
- Sound - Christine Wilson
- Set Construction - John Harris
- Assistant Set Constructors - Bert Lenny, Chas Cheetham & Peter Davies
- Director's Aide - Sheila Harris
- Box Office/F.O.H. - Frank Howcutt
- Photographs - Bim Harding
Reviews
"Gentleman's Gentleman"
Robert Maugham's novel "The Servant" achieved its wider fame at second hand, through the powerful Joseph Losey film, scripted by Harold Pinter and dominated by Dirk Bogard's chilling performance as the servant-turned-master Barrett.
Maugham's own adaptation for the stage enabled him, as it were, to get out from under this formidable team, and to speak with his own voice. It proves to be no unworthy voice, though I feel a more experienced dramatist would have found a more free-flowing alternative to the nine self-contained scenes which defeat the tensions if his play.
The theme is one of psycho-sexual domination, as the deferential Barret works on the weakness of his master Tony. Like some evil weed pushing its way through a garden he gradually comes to rule the house on his own terms leaving the weak and drunken Tony trailing weakly at his command.
I have no space to discuss the fascinating question of how Maugham's treatment of the story compares with Pinter's, though I would have much to say on that subject. The producer at the S.L.T.C. is John Harris, and his action is placed in an admirable split-level set representing living room, kitchen and bedroom.
The gaps between the scenes, though no doubt unavoidable, work against the drama. But there can be no doubt that in Robert Holden, Mr Harris has found a Barrett of very high voltage.
The actor establishes his credentials at the first entrance. He combines a commonplace voice with impeccable manners, yet we can see that there is an elusive air of corruption about him. He is sizing up the citadel prior to planning his assault on its defences.
As th play proceeds, and we see Barrett in his changing moods, he always seems to play them with icy calculation, and his scornful speech to a broken Tony, when it comes, is splendidly delivered and absolutely right.
The rest of the production is not so good. Brian Scoltock as Tony and Janet Blackely, as the girl who loves him, lack the bright sophistication which would give deadly point to Barrett's scheming. Roger Dettmeer needs more weight as Tony's publisher friend Richard Merton. All in all, the world that comes into collision with Barrett's is not clearly enough defined.
Vivienne Miles, as the sensual Vera, is good in her scenes with Barrettt, though inclined when with Tony to play it with gloves on, Sarah Saunders has a certain flaunting power as the seconf of Barrett's imports, and her work nicely brings the play to its sad conclusion.
Donald Madgwick, The Croydon Advertiser.
Gallery
Reminiscences and Anecdotes
Members are encouraged to write about their experiences of working on or seeing this production. Please leave your name. Anonymous entries may be deleted.
See Also
Have there been other SLTC/SLT productions of this play? Link to them here.
Or add anything that is related within this site. The author's page for instance or other plays with a similar theme.
References
<references/>
